The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has today published a consultation paper regarding its draft regulatory and implementing technical standards (RTS/ITS) which will implement the Benchmarks Regulation (BR).
ESMA is asking stakeholders to comment on its proposed RTS/ITS applicable to benchmark contributors, administrators and national competent authorities.
The new European regulatory framework for benchmarks will ensure their accuracy, robustness and integrity across the European Union. It will also clarify the behaviours and standards expected of administrators and contributors.
These requirements will ensure that benchmarks are produced in a transparent and reliable manner and so contribute to well-functioning and stable markets, and investor protection.
Steven Maijoor, ESMA Chair, stated: “Benchmarks lay at the heart of financial markets as they help to price assets and measure the performance of investments. Therefore, we need to ensure their accuracy and integrity: fair play is essential for investors.
The Regulation sets out to do so by providing a common regulatory framework under which benchmarks are provided, produced and used thoroughly. This will help to restore trust both in benchmarks and financial markets.”
The key provisions of ESMA’s draft RTS/ITS cover both benchmark contributors and administrators:
The consultation paper also includes the actual draft legal text and a preliminary high-level cost-benefit analysis. ESMA will consider the feedback to the consultation and finalise the draft RTS/ITS in order to submit them to the European Commission by 1 April 2017.
Benchmarks are used in financial markets as a reference to price financial instruments and to measure performance of investment funds, and are used in many financial contracts. Their integrity is critical to financial markets and to investors in particular. The BR’s objective is to improve the governance and control over the benchmark process, thereby ensuring their reliability and protecting users.
Next Finance , October 2016
2009 was a year of intense reflection on the functioning of the financial sector. There followed an intense regulatory activity in 2010, unfortunately with few formal adoptions of regulations. 2011 marked the surge of the will to succeed with provisional schedules. Where do (...)