›  News 

CalPERS Settles Moody’s Negligent Ratings Case for Record $130 Million

The California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) today announced it has settled its case against Moody’s and Moody’s Investors’ Services (Moody’s) for a record $130 million. The case stemmed from Moody’s erroneous ratings of "AAA" rated structured investment vehicles prior to the financial crisis.

Article also available in : English EN | français FR

The California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) today announced it has settled its case against Moody’s and Moody’s Investors’ Services (Moody’s) for a record $130 million. The case stemmed from Moody’s erroneous ratings of "AAA" rated structured investment vehicles prior to the financial crisis. Early in 2015, CalPERS settled with defendant Standard & Poor’s (S&P) for $125 million, bringing total recovery from the now-concluded lawsuit to $255 million.

"This resolves our lawsuit against Moody’s and restores money that belongs to our members and employers," said Matthew Jacobs, General Counsel for CalPERS. "We are eager to put this money back to work to help ensure the long-term sustainability of the Fund."

CalPERS sued Moody’s and other rating agencies in 2009 after the Pension Fund sustained losses from investments in three structured investment vehicles that relied on the liquidity of assets that turned out to be illiquid, such as subprime RMBS, CDOs and other asset-backed securities.

In the lawsuit, CalPERS alleged that Moody’s made "negligent misrepresentations" by assigning the investments their highest credit rating. This caused significant losses as the market for structured finance securities collapsed in late 2007.

In addition to obtaining a substantial recovery for investment losses, this case was path-breaking in that the settlements rank as the largest known recovery from Moody’s and S&P in a private lawsuit for civil damages. The case also established through a landmark appellate court decision that rating agencies can be liable for negligent misrepresentations under California law for their ratings of privately-placed securities.

"This should serve as a cautionary reminder to all investors who rely on rating agencies to guide their investments," Jacobs added.

Next Finance , March 11

Article also available in : English EN | français FR

Share
Send by email Email
Viadeo Viadeo

Focus

News Institutional investor appetite is back for quant funds

The recent CTA performances encourage institutional investors to more closely monitor this type of hedge fund. Thus, according to Preqin, 52% of them wish to increase their exposure to this type of alternative strategy this year (vs 14% last (...)

© Next Finance 2006 - 2016 - All rights reserved